Pursuing Online Video Strategy (TV model vs Category model)

We have been experimenting with video content for the past 2 years and it seems like we are finding new ways to achieve audience growth.  Content is typically “king” but success also comes down to how easy it is to find content on the web. In that regard, the importance of tagging was far greater than we ever anticipated.

Recently one of our video websites, 4flagtv.com, changed it’s approach to video. Originally 4flagtv.com shared content with it’s sister site, 4cornerstv.com, based in Durango, Co. Our hope from a production and business perspective was that sharing video content between the sites would increase our inventory and give our audience more content than one production team could produce.

However, analytics showed us that videos produced in the Durango area scored poorly when compared to the page views and time spent on videos produced in Flagstaff, about Flagstaff. To support this notion we wanted to pull all the non-Flagstaff content off the site and focus on local coverage. As we prototyped what the site would look like we had very few ‘shows’ left on the site. Up to that point our programming was similar to a broadcast model.

The Broadcast model

Originally, there were shows on our Flagstaff site with particular topics and a specific host, and they were published on a regular schedule. But we were hearing from the production team that the broadcast model was actually confining what they would cover because they were always trying to find a story that would fit into the shows’ format. One such example was Escape the Grind, a show about fitness. Our shows were simply too constrictive to allow us to adequately cover topics outside their scope.

In another show, #Flag, we had far fewer parameters on what we were doing. It’s open-ended content allowed us much more free range in coverage, letting us bring together disparate topics in its two-minute-plus running time that was far more of a YouTube model than what we had been doing.

#Flag taught us that it was the content, not the brand (especially at the show level), that was important to the younger readers we wanted to court. These millennials were far more accustomed to the YouTube model of programming, not the broadcast model. And if you’re true to your audience, you need to follow what they’re familiar and comfortable with, not what you want to impose on them. Our audience didn’t care about “shows,” so we needed to move away from slavishly producing them. We also needed to acknowledge that our audience cares about specific content, and they search it out by categories.

 

The Youtube model

We decided to break the broadcast model of branded shows and move to a system that utilizes topics and tags to associate content for the user. It also allows the production team to cover a much broader range of content.

What’s different for our users? Now when they come to the site, instead of seeing videos categorized by show name and episodes, they are greeted with the latest content published in reverse chronological order. Each video has collection of tags connected to it. A user may start with a video on bicycle products, but be exposed to links to other topics such as “industrial design, bicycles, business profile, sports, downtown, Flag and Dapper Dre (a local celebrity).

The idea is to get the user to follow a click trail to videos about their favorite things. To make it easier for them, we went back through over 2,000 videos and retagged them with additional information. Navigationally, our site is now structured to make it easy to find content based on categories of content, trending content and newest releases.

We spent much time and energy promoting our show names and branded websites when in reality our viewers only really cared about content categories and the pure entertainment value we could offer. Our road map now follows a major and important detour that emphasizes tags over titles.

Below are 3 examples of our current format.

 

B67864B0-C6A3-48D9-B7A1-B72B6F40F34216E77133-C072-409E-A4DA-5BEEFDF0EFF680D2221E-73BE-4D32-ADCF-9B4CEC4609C8

Campaign Is A Success According to Agency “Not so Much”

Case Study using Adsperity software to monitor ad campaign

Background

A campaign was created for a software company to drive awareness and sign up for demonstrations of the company’s software product. The Adsperity product was used to track results of the campaign and then compare to the agency responsible for placing the campaign. The campaign was flighted across desktop and mobile for the purpose of promoting the software product and ultimately signing users to license the software. This campaign was a way to gain awareness and provide potential clients the ability to engage with the software product team through the website.

Flow

A word on success: Ad campaigns can and often reveal several success points. In the case of this software product, one of the key goals was set to get people to fill out a form to sign up for demonstration of software. This particular element relates to customer acquisition while other parts of the campaign relate to awareness. To understand the success of this campaign it is important to distinguish between the two. The definition of conversion and success in this instance is that users will use the form on the website and “request a demo”. While that is not explicitly acquisition it is the step towards acquisition. Moreover, an argument can be made that a potential user may spend some time on the website to gain information and over time will convert to a paying user.

Also, it is noteworthy to discuss pacing. By definition, pacing is the speed at which purchased ads are delivered based on month/day/hour. Although you can find numerous articles written on the skill sets of ad ops and their pacing practices, suffice it to say that more modern ad servers use algorithms to help with this. And even if the particular ad server cannot accomplish this, it’s a fairly simple task. Understanding your product and market render pacing what I call a “so what” checkbox.

For example, most everyone can figure out that the software company ads should not be shown to extreme North America computers at 3am. While you can argue that living in the tundra one may need our product, it is unlikely. Therefore the focus should have been on large metropolitan areas during business hours. And a targeting focus to sites that will engage highly potential users.

DoubleClick for example runs a very extensive algorithm to help ads ops make those decisions on the fly and can change them automatically.

Campaign Solution

It is important to start with understanding of the pricing and impression model of the campaign. First, the campaign had a budget spend of $25,199 to deliver a total of 5,472,426 impressions over the course of 3 months.

Impressions_vs_Actual

Pacing total is 85% (in this statistic pacing is percentage of planned vs. actual not the speed at which the ads are delivered unless you divide by the number of days during the campaign and derive the number of ads delivered per day.)

Top 10

Retargeting

MNI Performance

Targeting Channels and impressions: There were 5 channels that were targeted during this campaign. Of them, the DataPoint Display Audience received the most impressions.

MNI

The targeting and impressions are somewhat aligned with the goals at first blush. The list of targeted sites can be seen in the same vein as a target audience. The initial launch of the campaign sees that ads being run to a list of websites on desktop are correctly identified. The pacing and impressions within the campaign can be seen as being as aligned with software company goals. However, Adsperity’s SmartVision tells a different story.

Results

SmartVision- The results from Adsperity’s Smartvision conclude that the overall engagement of the campaign was very low. While users did go to the website. The amount of time spent on the website was low. The graph below shows that the most time spent was on the index page and the about page.

 

Blog pic case study

TTR and TSR: The time to read the ad ranged from 1 to 1.5 seconds and the time users actually spent reading the ad range, on average, from 0.2 seconds to 1 second. Within the algorithm this statistic indicates the accidental clicks were the majority of clicks. Those that were not in the majority indicate that most of the clicks occurred after the ad had been on the page for more than a minute. Combining these statistics gives us the performance rating, which was very low.

If we combine that with the time on the website we can see that engagement was mostly accidental. Furthermore, those who did get to the website never filled out a form. Just over 6300 pages views during the campaign at 2 filled out the form. Less than 2% clicked through to the website and virtually 0% filled out the form. This data excludes bounce rate, which can be also derived from the SmartVision’s low performance rating.

3 million ad units served, 6300 page views and 2 forms filled out.

During Ad:Tech New York several people indicated that they had seen the software product ad and visited software company booth to check out product which speaks to awareness.

There were two spikes in website and ad activity once at the beginning of the campaign and the second during Ad:Tech New York. Other than those two improvements in activity the ad campaign and website activity stayed at a steady low. As for the ads spiking it is unclear if agency changed the targeting or pacing during this time. With both increasing it is reasonably safe to conclude that there was an increase in engagement to the extent that more visitors were being pushed to the site.

Conclusion

Data points as they relate to success of campaign (ads delivered vs price paid, ads planned vs. actual, CTR) given the data points received from agency, Google Analytics and Smartvision, it is clear that there were some differences in the data. First it was clear through SmartVision that engagement remained low while accidental clicks were the majority. This was different from the “pacing model” that was given by the agency data points. While 2% of the campaign was driven to the website, and it should be noted this is roughly average, the agency data shows a more positive outlook than the SmartVision data. If the only goal was to raise awareness, this still remains the cheapest option to do so. If success also includes CTR and a request for a demo than this may have little impact by comparison to person-to-person contact. While on the subject of CTR, SmartVision concluded that the CTR was mostly false through accidental clicks. But overall the comparison to the agency data, SmartVision was clearly more informative.

Useful data vs. popular data: Most of the data points in the campaign that were provided by the agency were based on Pacing and CTR. While that data is useful to an extent, the reality is that the data is incomplete forcing the data analyst to make “assumptions”. For example the assumption that the ads drove 2% of the views to the website, therefore there was engagement (albeit very little engagement). While CTR has a place, it was very clear given the fact that most of the time click-through happened within 0.2 seconds of the ad appearing. That was not nearly enough time for the animated ads to compete their animated sequences. These assumptions seem to be everywhere in the data. Even the targeting has an amount of assumptions. Over half of the impressions came from retargeting. Answers.com was the most targeted site during the campaign.

Audience targeting in this campaign may have had some attribution to the poor performance. While one can argue that retargeting allows for more specific audience acquisition, in this case it did not. The list of websites indicates that a few of the sites where the ad ran were outside of purview of Adsperity. In fact, the ads ran on non-English websites. Given that Adsperity is not localized to several languages, this may have had an impact on success. The list of target websites were not what Adsperity would consider viable targets for the campaign. The targeting was somewhat misleading. You can clearly see the areas and target websites (listed above), what is not as clearly evident are the exact pages the ads were shown. SmartVision gave us insight to those pages. For example there are several websites listed but the ads were redirected once they hit the targeted site to “other sites” like wuxiaworld.com, a Chinese martial arts fiction website. Or zehabesha.com, an Ethiopian news site. The overall list may have been on the “approved” list, what is not clear is why the other websites made the list. The retargeting data did not specify where the ads were run for retargeting as opposed to targeted websites. Also, there was no indication of the ad servers and networks that our ads ran through. The data from the agency did not include this information. The ad ops for the Adsperity campaign made no indication of how the targeting was done in the reporting.

Lastly, the data from SmartVision and Google Analytics (website) indicate that while there was an increase in visitors to the website during the campaign the time spent both on ads and website were negligible and lacking engagement. Awareness may have had a boost through Ad:Tech New York. Conversely, the agency data, while focused on CTR and “Conversions” shows that the campaign was minimally successful based on those criteria. If 2% is success.

Overall I was very pleased that the Adsperity product produced analytics that really told a different and more accurate story on the success or lack of success with the software company’s campaign. In today’s digital advertising space it is very difficult to gauge success without utilizing new measurement models and techniques. Agencies need to become more sophisticated in what they report. This particular case study really shows the disconnect between what an agency deems success and what the true reality of the campaign is when measured properly. We have many more exciting aspects being added to the Adsperity product and I look forward to continuing to build new case studies.

 

 

Mobile Ads Are The Future But We Need a Reboot

It’s obvious that mobile advertising can perform much better for media companies than it is now. Publisher Doug Bennett has been working on the problem of maximizing mobile ROI, and he shares some of the evolving functions he has been able to build out in-house that point to incremental improvements.

If Elon Musk built cars the way they’re “supposed” to be built, we wouldn’t have an electric car that goes 0 to 60 in 3.5 seconds. When Steve Jobs decided that portable phones were really computers needing Apple’s attention, it changed our world. The lesson? If you’re willing to rethink everything you know and start from scratch with no sacred cows, you can do great things. That’s exactly where we are in mobile advertising today. We need a do-over with a laser focus on maximizing ROI.

The long-held belief of digital marketing is that display advertising is a powerful and cost-effective tool, while mobile advertising is unpredictable and unreliable. The question is whether or not mobile advertising can do better. It can.

Mobile devices are an incredible enabler for consumers and businesses, but they have been hamstrung by an ad model based on desktop ad thinking (which itself is based on traditional print ad thinking). When you combine this with the constant influx of new devices, features and software and then add ever-evolving user behavior and mindsets, you have massive missed potential and an ROI nightmare.

So what do we do? Do we throw out everything that’s known about mobile advertising and start from scratch? We could, but we’d be throwing out massive amounts of priceless data. Instead, let’s reinvent the entire process of mobile advertising. Let’s stop making ads with the hope that they work and maybe give us some useful data. Instead, let’s use pre-analytics (the data we have) to drive creative decisions, and drastically improve our odds for real success. And while we’re at it, let’s make creating ads a lot easier, too. There are many companies pursuing an answer to this problem. Celtra, PaperG, Flite and our own product called Adsperity are among them. All of these products are pursuing strategies that try to make mobile ads work, and we will all likely find success in increments.

Easy Way to Create Mobile Ads

Easy Way to Create Mobile Ads

We wanted to make mobile ads easy to create, publish and track, but we changed our focus to the analytics that tell us what is happening with a mobile ad. As the ad is being designed, the tool we developed automatically codes it in HTML5, CSS3 and Javascript. It also does quality assurance on the ad, confirming that it meets all mobile ad standards like file weight, size specs and more so it’s guaranteed to work on any device, browser and operating system in an easy to understand environment. You no longer need to be a code wonk to use it.

We’ve also tried to take on mobile advertising’s Achilles heel—cookies. First and third party desktop cookies break down for a number of reasons in the mobile space, from incompatibility across devices and operating systems to automatic and frequent browser cache clearing. To solve this problem, we created custom tagging technology. The instant an ad that we’ve created runs, we know the device type, the OS, browser, connectivity, location, time, interaction rate, time spent and more. A custom dashboard helps users dig into this data, parse it any way one wants and get actionable insights one can use to optimize the ad or create new ones from scratch.

SmartVision-gauges[4]

Adsperity Measures ROI Effectiveness of Mobile Ad


The world of mobile is always evolving: new devices, new capabilities, new operating systems, new browsers and whatever else is next. That means we must evolve, too, so we can accomplish the one thing that will never change – our singular goal of maximizing mobile ROI.

Seeking a Younger Audience Using Video – Make Sure You Understand Audience

4 Corners TV has built a growing audience of 25-45-year-olds, but constant experimentation in its year-long existence has shown that younger viewers don’t want straight news from their online videos, even if it’s irreverent. What its Southwestern audience does like is content on pot, extreme sports and local comedy, and the site is taking another crack at news, this time with a sock puppet.  See full article at NetNewsCheck.com.

By Doug Bennett

4CornersTV-home

It’s hard to imagine that last year at this time we were preparing for the first episode of 4CornersTV.com, an online network sprung from the understanding that our newspapers did not attract a younger demographic. Our goal was to attract and retain a younger audience through new formats and content choices.

Initial audience reactions led us away from daily coverage of socially-focused news to more entertainment-themed content on a weekly schedule. The coverage of adventure sports, craft breweries and other topics related to the four corners area of the Southwest and specifically the Durango, Colo. area resulted in a steady growth trajectory of site visits.

Here’s just a snapshot of the data we’ve collected in our first year: over half of weekly viewers are 25-45-years-old. We’ve seen an average 3,000 videos viewed each week (or over 12,000 views a month) and growing.

Other things we’ve noticed: 75% of all visits convert into video views, 54% of our visitors each week are new and 40% of traffic comes from mobile devices.

Because this demographic is more and more likely to consume its entertainment through mobile devices, we weren’t surprised at the numbers of tablets and smart phones in the analytics. What was surprising is that desktop usage is still very popular. This seems to correlate with the highest viewing times ranging from Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. to 2 p.m., when 57% of usage comes from desktop, leading us to believe this group has a habit of watching at work.

Eager to continue the steady increase in views, we reached outside our area to Farmington, New Mexico to tap into a larger audience.

Although the city of Farmington is only 45 miles away, it is demographically different and has over twice the population. To directly appeal to this audience, we featured Farmington specific episodes hosted by local talent, including a Navajo comedy team. The numbers jumped significantly, with average monthly site visits climbing from 12,000 to over 25,000 with over half in the desired age group.

Happy with the success we experienced when adding in additional geographic areas, we experimented with a strategic approach to our content to raise the number of our younger demographic visitors.

The 4CornersTV.com mission of delivering stories with an irreverent tone led us to push the boundaries with topics like cannabis, covering everything from dispensaries to edibles and more. Again, we saw a jump in interest. We also went more extreme with our adventure sports coverage showing mountain climbing, night biking and ice climbing, to name a few atypical sports popular in our area. This resulted in an all-time episode high and increased visitors in the target age group by 12 points.

During this period of testing we confirmed that straight news, even with an irreverent tone, was the least-watched programming. But we’re not ready to give up on news altogether, so we’re looking to models like “The Simpsons” to take a cynical, more off-kilter and character-driven approach to news to appeal to this important age group.

With this in mind, we’re introducing Phil N. Handy, a very talented sock puppet, to anchor our news desk. He’ll focus on slightly off-color stories using a humorous delivery, while keeping a straight face, as it were.

We’re beginning Phil’s welcome campaign through a mock press release and using social media to target groups that enjoy funny, experimental news content. This move towards more unconventional programming will be measured through audience growth numbers over the next quarter to determine if Phil’s “contract” will be renewed.

The lessons learned in our first year have brought a measure of success and given us the flexibility to try new ideas. Along the way, we realized that additional staffing was necessary to pull off the kind of programming that has worked, so we’ve added another editor and show producer along the way. Fortunately, our focus on entertainment over news has created a higher acceptance rate among advertisers, helping us to absorb the cost.

Our change is ongoing, and 4 Corners TV will constantly be experimenting and pushing the boundaries to capture this profitable younger demographic. We’re also in early stages of planning expansion into new cities with similar demographics as areas we serve today, but that’s a story for another time.greenlight[1]

Inform and Entertain is Key to Success with Online Vid @4CornersTV.com

I just finished writing an article giving a progress report on the online video channel 4CornersTV.com for NetNewsCheck.com. We are off to a great start and I hope you find this information useful. For the full article go to NetNewsCheck.com.

4ctv-logo-tagline[1]

 

4CornersTV.com, launched in February by Ballantine Communications Inc, represents a new initiative for media companies to do what will be essential to their continued success; connect with new and younger audiences.

Knowing that a demographic of 30-45 year olds would not be engaged as strongly with traditional news formats, 4CornersTV.com was created to provide them content that both informs and entertains while being accessible to them in the formats they like at any time and on any device.

After more than three months of daily production with over 275 videos produced, there have been a number of significant things we have learned. The first, and likely the most important, is the relationship between content and audience engagement. Striking a balance between information and entertainment, with the latter being the most crucial, has been the most substantially effective way to boost traffic.

Since we made adjustments to programming, caused by a slowing growth rate in our targeted audience (according Google Analytics) we have seen a 63% growth in traffic, averaging 4% growth each week. 53% of audience is between the ages of 25-45. And 30% of our traffic is from mobile devices. Our audience values the enjoyment of 4CornersTV.com programming more than it does the information gathering.

This was very evident to us on an April Fools edition of our daily “news” program “The Local Roundup.” While the Roundup has a strong daily audience, consumers weren’t as prone to share or engage with it. So we decided to use April 1 as a test case in favoring entertainment over information, and produced a program filled entirely with fake news.

From federal controls on beer production (a taboo topic in our home state of Colorado) to piranhas in a local river, the fake-news allowed humor to shine through our traditional format. This resulted in the most watched episode of “The Local Roundup” to date, and led us to a more focused initiative to drive entertainment as a first priority of production.

This focus on entertainment has also been reflected in the topics we choose to cover. Generally, the episodes that more directly reflect aspects of the area’s lifestyle are most successful. Shows about mountain biking, rafting and other adventure sports are better received than more socially-focused news.

Home Page Overview[3]

One surprising development in the first three months of production was the more peripheral role of our newsrooms in 4CornersTV.com. Ballantine Communications owns several newspapers, including The Durango Herald and The Cortez Journal. Initially, we assumed that we would draw heavily on the expertise of those newsrooms for content creation on 4CornersTV.com.

In reality, this expertise was more frequently utilized in an advisory role. The newsroom has passed along ideas that better fit the audience and experience we are focused on at 4CornersTV.com. Our newsroom now plays more of a role as a source for material, as 4CornersTV.com staff writes their own material and depending on story also originates the content.

We have also spent extensive time examining how to maximize workflow for the resources we have available. We must strike a balance between the time it takes to find great stories with the time required to produce daily programming. This has made it essential to set aside time for production teams to sit down and look ahead.

The questions we found ourselves asking: What events are happening in the next month? Which is the right show and host for this story or that? Is there a way to make this more entertaining for our audience? Being intentional about the content and branding choices we make has enabled us to couple production and promotion effectively. We needed to follow the same approach as a company dedicated to video production. Our efforts with video were thus the primary intent as opposed to an add on video to a news story.

The most impactful way 4CornersTV can build its brand and cultivate new audiences is through the addition of new programming and hosts. The first imperative is relatively straightforward. We determine the show we’d like to make, agree on a creative direction and outline the first collection of episodes.

Matching the talent with the program has proven to be a more involved process. Once a creative direction has been established for the show, the next consideration is finding the host that fits with that strategy. At 4CornersTV it starts with a casting call.

We look for hosts who seem natural on camera, even if slightly unpolished, but are able to convey an enthusiasm about the subjects they are covering. For example, once we understood that our show “In the Neighborhood” needed to be fun and fast paced with original content, we hired a host who was willing to have fun herself on camera when engaging the subject, such as letting the audience fly along with her on her first sky dive.

Flying HIGH in the Sky Hero Image[5]

Check out the rest of the article on NetNewsCheck.com. Enjoy.

 

Building a Video Channel: First Steps

I recently wrote an article for NetNewsCheck.com on the topic of building an online video channel within the confines of a traditional media business.  I included a portion of the article on my blog.  You can read entire article on NetNewsCheck.com.

As the CEO of a traditional media company, I think a lot about building audiences these days.

My company, Ballantine Communications, Inc.  (BCI), owns and operates several daily newspapers in Southwest Colorado, including The Durango Herald and The Cortez Journal. For nearly 50 years, it has been a leading source of news in these areas. But like most media organizations, BCI needs new, younger audiences to continue its strong role in the community.

To reach this demographic (ages 30-45), traditional news formats are not going to be an effective method of distribution, no matter the relevancy of the content. This audience is far more likely to consume news on a mobile device. In fact, they actively seek out video content to inform them on everything from news, celebrity gossip, buying decisions and life choices.

So my team concluded that the right type of programming for us to launch was a local-online TV channel, which we call 4cornersTV.com (4CTV). But we internally debated: Should the content be focused solely on the interests of locals? Or should it have more universal appeal to match the information tourists are looking for when researching the area? For an organization rooted in a history of traditional journalism distributed in traditional formats, an online TV channel is an exciting prospect, but logistical questions abound.

4ctv-logo-tagline[1]

Here was our challenge: How could we incorporate the skill sets that have been cultivated through 50-years of news gathering and content creation into a video channel focused on a new demographic, in a new format with new goals while continuing our role as a prominent information outlet for the community?

Is it possible to strategically allocate internal resources, like writers and photojournalists from the newspapers, to help create the initial mass of content 4CTV would need to entice viewers? Would these resources understand how to create content that appeals to a previously under-served demographic?

What amount of capital investment would be needed to launch 4CTV before definitive content and operational procedures were in place? Essentially, how could BCI launch 4CTV with compelling content and the ability improve its programming on the fly but without a financial over-commitment?

To successfully launch 4CTV on Jan. 27, we decided that the initial investment would have to be in talent and expertise. We budgeted to spend $25,000 per quarter. These personnel needed to produce content sought by the target audience and to manage a continuous production schedule. We found there was no substitute for the unique overlapping skill sets needed not only to produce content, but also create and manage the procedures that will be the govern the channel as a whole.

The challenges in building a new channel from scratch could only be overcome by focusing on relevant content creation and by providing local advertisers with strong opportunities to market to these prospective customers through video.

home-group[1]

As we built the 4CTV team, the need for demographic relevance had to be incorporated into everything from marketing to development to composition of our production team.

As we moved ahead – and continue to do so – we take every step guided by this core question: Is this content relevant to the needs of our target audience and the way they interact with digital devices? For an audience of 30-45-year-olds living in Southwestern Colorado, much of that content had to be informed by the unique lifestyle they live. In this case, this audience is active, locally-focused and drawn to the area for reasons other than a career.  Check out rest of article on NetNewsCheck.

How Publishers Should Forge A Video Strategy

I recently wrote an article for NetNewsCheck.com on the topic of original video content and should publishers pursue this strategy.  I included a portion of the article on my blog.  You can read entire article on NetNewsCheck.com.

Untitled1

 

Online video can prompt many questions for a publisher. Should it be short, curated clips that serve as a supplement to a story? Original video content that can stand alone? Should the video be designed specifically for mobile or desktop?

But the most important question to ask is this: Who is the publisher trying to reach? If the answer is a new audience such as a younger demographic, then the process of producing video must begin with collecting and reviewing data that supports the interests of this audience.

It’s also important to realize that starting with a mobile experience and bridging back to desktop may be a critical element to consider as well.

Publishers must begin the process by framing out some key questions, then laying out a plan to support their strategy.

What do we know about the audience?

Is the target younger then traditional users? I recently was involved in the creation of a video strategy to reach a much younger audience (30-45-year-olds). We felt we had some great content that would resonate well with this demographic, but we knew we had to develop even more.

In looking at Scarborough data for 30-45 year-olds, we found the interests were ranked differently from a typical audience for a news site. Top activities for this audience in the last 12 months included (in order of preference): Swimming, gardening, jogging, bicycling, photography, volunteer work, bowling, camping, fishing and backpacking.

We quickly learned that this younger demographic had similar interests to our current audience, yet it was dramatically more active, and hence ranked certain activities differently in terms of importance. Data from BI Intelligence and IDC also indicated the audience was very connected and decidedly at the much-vaunted intersection of social, local and mobile.

What type of content would they be interested in?

Based on information above, the ideal programming for this age demographic was related to physical activities, things-to-do and lifestyle. If one then considers the digitally-connected aspect and the proliferation of video with this younger demographic, it was fairly easy to determine the need for curated, compelling and original video content to stimulate their minds.

Do publishers already have any of this content? If not, where do they get it?

Read the rest of this article on NetNewsCheck.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 749 other followers